Skip to content

Mouse

TH (Thalamus) functionally connects to LA (Lateral amygdalar nucleus)

4 claims from 2 sources: 4 found, 0 tested and absent, 0 ambiguous. Evidence: electrical stimulation, optogenetic circuit mapping.

The claims behind it

clm-6dd565009dpresentoptogenetic circuit mappingproposed

In amygdala slices, optical activation of ChrimsonR-expressing thalamic axons evoked AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic currents in lateral amygdala neurons recorded in whole-cell mode (with GABA-A and NMDA receptors blocked); co-illumination with yellow light suppressed these responses.

DOI 10.7554/elife.91421 · PubMed 39023519 · PMC11257676, Figure 2a-c

Made by an AI model reading the paper (claude-opus-5, extract@0.3.0); a second AI model (claude-opus-5) agrees.

clm-86s0absc16presentoptogenetic circuit mappingproposed

Blue light pulses on oChIEF- or ChrimsonR-expressing thalamic axons evoked field EPSPs recorded in the lateral amygdala of anesthetized mice; these responses were potentiated by high-frequency optical stimulation and were abolished by the AMPA receptor blocker NBQX and by TTX, showing a glutamatergic synaptic connection.

DOI 10.7554/elife.91421 · PubMed 39023519 · PMC11257676, Figure 1c,d; Figure 2f

Made by an AI model reading the paper (claude-opus-5, extract@0.3.0); a second AI model (claude-opus-5) agrees.

clm-fdf7h6zwdxpresentelectrical stimulationproposed

Internal capsule stimulation evoked excitatory currents in GAD67-GFP lateral amygdala interneurons recorded together with neighbouring principal neurons.

DOI 10.3389/fncel.2019.00220 · PubMed 31164805 · PMC6536628, Fig. 1E; Fig. 2D; Supplementary Fig. 1

Made by an AI model reading the paper (claude-opus-5-5, extract@0.3.0); a second AI model (claude-opus-5-5) agrees.

clm-p83f3yrqjtpresentelectrical stimulationproposed

Electrical stimulation of internal capsule (thalamic) afferent fibres in lateral amygdala slices evoked EPSPs in putative pyramidal cells, and weak tetanic stimulation produced a transient potentiation of these responses.

DOI 10.7554/elife.91421 · PubMed 39023519 · PMC11257676, Figure 5d-f

Made by an AI model reading the paper (claude-opus-5, extract@0.3.0); a second AI model (claude-opus-5) agrees.